|
When
Illness Tests Marriage Vows
By:
Judy Foreman
07/17/2001
Several
years ago, Dr. Michael J. Glantz, a brain cancer specialist, was
struck by what appeared to be an extraordinary number of divorces
and separations among his patients, many of whom had primary brain
tumors that were expected to kill them in 15 months.
Not only did there seem to be lots of breakups, but most of
them seemed to occur when the women got sick. So, Glantz, who was
then at Brown University and is moving this summer to the
University of Arizona, began keeping track.
To
the surprise of his male but not his female colleagues, Glantz
found that 17 out of 183 married brain cancer patients had endured
a divorce or separation within about a year of their diagnosis -
an overall divorce rate of 9 percent. More importantly, he said,
14 of the 17 divorced or separated patients - 82 percent - were
women.
To
see whether this was tied to something particularly stressful
about brain cancer, which can alter personality and cognitive
function, Glantz also studied two other groups: 107 married
patients with multiple sclerosis, a chronic disease that is not
usually fatal, and 172 married patients with cancers that neither
arose in nor had spread to the brain.
Divorces
in those cases, too, he found, disproportionately occurred when it
was the wife who was sick - 96 percent of the cases with MS, 78
percent of the cases of systemic cancer.
One
rather unappealing interpretation is obvious: That women hang in
there with sick husbands while men bail out on sick wives. But
stay with this a bit longer, guys. And, ladies, don't despair.
This is not heading to the all-men-are-cads conclusion you may be
expecting.
For
years, when researchers probed the emotional impact of cancer and
other serious illnesses, they usually focused on the patient.
Today, there's a growing realization that, at least in the
emotional sense, it's the couple or the whole family that
"has" the disease.
In
fact, the well spouse sometimes feels more distress than the sick
one, who at least can throw his or her efforts into survival. And,
while some men do have trouble taking on the nurturing role,
researchers say, many do it quite well. In fact, many couples get
closer when one member has cancer, especially if the marriage was
strong to start with. Beth and David Savard of Methuen can vouch
for that, though things got very shaky while she was in the midst
of chemotherapy for breast cancer six years ago. Both 35 now, they
were 29 and the parents of a 2-year-old when Beth was diagnosed.
David could deal with the factual issues about cancer, she said,
but he shut down emotionally.
"He
was not talking about his feelings. I was trying to talk about
mine, but I couldn't talk to him because I was not getting a
response."
They
were about to see a divorce lawyer when they went to a We Can
Weekend, an annual family retreat sponsored by the American Cancer
Society. During that weekend, David began to talk and cry with
other men whose wives had cancer. He began to tell Beth how
helpless he felt, she recalled. He even voiced the most
frightening feeling of all - that she would die and he would have
to raise their child alone.
Many
couples say that "when cancer came in, communication went
out," Beth Savard said. But it needn't be that way. Today,
Beth said, she and David are "very, very talkative. We share
a lot."
Having
cancer or a spouse with cancer, particularly brain cancer,
has"got to be the most stressful thing in the world,"
said Dr. John Henson, executive director of the brain tumor center
at Massachusetts General Hospital. And generally, he has found,
couples are extremely supportive of each other.
But
often, he said, the spouse with cancer often has some level of
denial, "which is probably a healthy coping mechanism."
The healthy spouse even may be more emotionally affected,
something that Henson said has nothing to do with gender.
Frank
McCaffrey, a clinical social worker who runs support groups at
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for men whose wives have
advanced cancer, agreed. If the spouse who gets cancer has
historically been the one who has provided most of the emotional
caretaking, he said, the well spouse, regardless
of gender, "has to evolve and be able to understand
that the patient, the ill spouse, can't provide the same emotional
caring and support that they have been."
Not
surprisingly, this is easier if the marriage is good to start
with. "If the marriage was teetering before, it gets harder.
They are the ones at most risk," said Dr. Jimmie Holland,
chief of psychiatry and behavioral science at Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
Even
Glantz's data, alarming as it seems at first blush, does not
actually prove that the divorce rate is higher than normal among
couples in which one spouse has cancer or MS.
If
anything, the opposite may be true.
According
to data released in May by the National Center for Health
Statistics, 43 percent of first marriages end in separation or
divorce within 15 years; 20 percent end within five years.
It's
statistically risky to compare national divorce rates, which
include many young couples, with divorce rates in couples in which
one spouse gets a serious disease, in part because the latter
couples are often older, and possibly more mature. But Glantz's
study suggests that couples dealing with at least one serious
illness, MS, have a lower than average divorce rate, just 24
percent after a median of 14 years of followup.
That
doesn't surprise Steven Marcus, 58, a free-lance editor in
Brookline who has been married for 25 years to Kit Crowe, 51, a
librarian who was diagnosed with
MS just after their marriage. In recent years, he said, Kit has
not been able to work full time, and "it's been scary for me
to be the primary wage-earner
- that freaks me out sometimes."
But
splitting up has never crossed is mind.
"You
do the best you can," he said. "It's a question of love.
Even if you're freaked out, that's not enough to make you
run."
And
even when a couple divorces soon after the woman gets cancer, that
doesn't prove that her husband abandoned her.
Laurel
Northouse, a nurse with a doctorate in research who studies the
impact of cancer on couples at the University of Michigan School
of Nursing, has studied couples in which the wife has breast
cancer. She has found not only that the
divorce rate within the first 12 months of diagnosis is a
fairly low 3 to 4 percent, but that sometimes it's the woman who
decides not to spend whatever time she has left with a man she no
longer loves.
A
divorce soon after cancer may look "like the husband is
leaving her, but she may be saying, `Enough already,' "
Northouse said.
In
a study of colon cancer published last year, she said, female care
givers of men with cancer actually reported more distress than
their husbands. One reason for that, Northouse said, is that when
husbands become care givers, they are often seen as heroes doing
more than society expects.
"Nobody
brings casseroles to women when their husbands are sick because
people assume a woman can do the caretaking, that she's a natural
care giver. But women need help, too."
On
the other hand, when men become care givers, they often don't ask
for the support they need because they may be too stoic, said
Betty Ferrell, a nurse-researcher at City of Hope National Medical
Center in Duarte, Calif. Men "really do feel the financial
burden. They feel they must try to keep things normal, to keep
going to work."
The
bottom line is that when life-threatening disease strikes, the
marriage needs attention as well as the disease itself, said
psychologist David Cella of Northwestern University Medical
School. "It's very easy for people to put all the attention
on the treatment. But some attention should be spared to focus on
the couple."The American Cancer Society is enrolling
volunteers in a new study of quality
of life among cancer survivors and their families. Call
1-800-ACS-2345.
Judy
Foreman is a Lecturer on Medicine at Harvard Medical School. Her
column appears every other week. Past columns are available on www.myhealthsense.com.
To
Mental Health
To Cancer General
|